SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The impact of open access publishing agreements at the University of Vienna in light of the Plan S requirements: a review of current status, challenges and perspectives
3 references·1 citing·16 second hop
The impact of open access publishing agreements at the University of Vienna in light of the Plan S requirements: a review of current status, challenges and perspectives (2020)The impact of open access publishing agre…A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science (2019)A Criteria-based Assessment o…The weakest link – workflows in open access agreements: the experience of the Vienna University Library and recommendations for future negotiations (2018)The weakest link – workflows …It’s the workflows, stupid! What is required to make ‘offsetting’ work for the open access transition (2017)It’s the workflows, stupid! W…Austrian Transition to Open Access: a collaborative approach (2021)Austrian Transition to Open A…Offsetting and its discontents: challenges and opportunities of open access offsetting agreements (2017)Scholarly journal publishing in transition- from restricted to open access (2017)Open Science Support as a Portfolio of Services and Projects: From Awareness to Engagement (2018)Funding APCs from the research funder’s seat: Findings from the EC FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot (2019)Impact of Transformative Agreements on Publication Patterns (2024)Academics' behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals (2017)Monitoring the transition to open access (2017)Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics’ OA practice (2017)Monitoring open access publishing costs at Stockholm University (2019)Transformative agreements in the development of open access (2022)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Nomophobia: An Individual’s Growing Fear of Being without a Smartphone—A Systematic Literature Review (2020)Augmented Reality and Gamification in Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Research, Applications, and Empirical Studies (2022)Leadership styles and sustainable performance: A systematic literature review (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science343 cited
  • 2018The weakest link – workflows in open access agreements: the experience of the Vienna University Library and recommendations for future negotiations22 cited
  • 2017It’s the workflows, stupid! What is required to make ‘offsetting’ work for the open access transition21 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Austrian Transition to Open Access: a collaborative approach7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work