SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Rapid reviews: A critical perspective
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Rapid reviews: A critical perspective (2020)Rapid reviews: A critical perspectiveSingle-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial (2020)Single-reviewer abstract scre…Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Method…Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Single screening versus conve…Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Meeting the review family: ex…Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval (2019)Errors in search strategies u…Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks (2019)Definition of a systematic re…Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies (2018)Defining the process to liter…Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017)Optimal database combinations…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review (2016)What are the best methodologi…Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic (2015)Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid!…A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)A scoping review of rapid rev…Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Expediting systematic reviews…RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE? (2008)RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC …Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews (2006)Single data extraction genera…How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)How important are comprehensi…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (2003)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 (2020)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Reviewing measures of outcome: reliability of data extraction (2004)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)The development of software to support multiple systematic review types (2018)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews (2015)A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research (2020)What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review (2020)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review (2021)Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review (2020)A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being (2021)Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and Past Pandemics: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study2,181 cited
  • 2003How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study1,181 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews1,164 cited
  • 2015A scoping review of rapid review methods1,162 cited
  • 2010Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews756 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2019Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review639 cited
  • 2018Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies602 cited
  • 2019Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements599 cited
  • 2006Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews470 cited
  • 2016What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review415 cited
  • 2019Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks259 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2020
Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial
227 cited
  • 2019Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval218 cited
  • 2015Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic184 cited
  • 2008RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?170 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.