SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting and Interpretation of Subgroup Analyses in Heart Failure Randomized Controlled Trials
11 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Reporting and Interpretation of Subgroup Analyses in Heart Failure Randomized Controlled Trials (2020)Reporting and Interpretation of Subgroup …Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2017)Methodological Standards for …Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications (2014)Subgroup analyses in randomis…How to Use a Subgroup Analysis (2014)How to Use a Subgroup AnalysisSPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…Subgroup analyses (2012)Subgroup analysesCredibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review (2012)Credibility of claims of subg…Subgroup Analysis of Trials Is Rarely Easy (SATIRE): a study protocol for a systematic review to characterize the analysis, reporting, and claim of subgroup effects in randomized trials (2009)Subgroup Analysis of Trials I…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review (2017)A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research (2018)Exploring the characteristics, global distribution and reasons for retraction of published articles involving human research participants: a literature survey (2018)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Acknowledging Patient Heterogeneity in Economic Evaluation (2013)The Value of Heterogeneity for Cost-Effectiveness Subgroup Analysis (2014)A systematic review reveals that the credibility of subgroup claims in low back pain trials was low (2016)Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes (2002)Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses (2010)Sleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality: A flexible, non-linear, meta-regression of 40 prospective cohort studies (2016)Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)The lack of statistical power of subgroup analyses in meta-analyses: a cautionary note (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Before-bedtime passive body heating by warm shower or bath to improve sleep: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)Meta-Analysis (2020)With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Common Errors in Meta-Analyses and Meta-Regressions in Strength & Conditioning Research (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration (2015)Integrated primary care for patients with mental and physical multimorbidity: cluster randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for patients with depression comorbid with diabetes or cardiovascular disease (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 2014How to Use a Subgroup Analysis549 cited
  • 2012Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review395 cited
  • 2017Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association271 cited
  • 2014Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications102 cited
  • 2009Subgroup Analysis of Trials Is Rarely Easy (SATIRE): a study protocol for a systematic review to characterize the analysis, reporting, and claim of subgroup effects in randomized trials60 cited
  • 2012Subgroup analyses27 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work