Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Cost-benefit comparison of carbon capture, utilization, and storage retrofitted to different thermal power plants in China based on real options approach

6 references·4 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011A real options–based CCS investment evaluation model: Case study of China’s power generation sector196 cited
2019The public costs of climate-induced financial instability193 cited
2010Uncertainty modeling of CCS investment strategy in China’s power sector171 cited
2013A novel modeling based real option approach for CCS investment evaluation under multiple uncertainties158 cited
2016An uncertainty analysis of subsidy for carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofitting investment in China's coal power plants using a real-options approach107 cited
2019How can carbon capture utilization and storage be incentivized in China? A perspective based on the 45Q tax credit provisions74 cited

Cited by

2023Can fossil energy make a soft landing？— the carbon-neutral pathway in China accompanying CCS70 cited
2024Study on the diffusion of CCUS technology under carbon trading mechanism: Based on the perspective of tripartite evolutionary game among thermal power enterprises, government and public68 cited
2023How do multiple policy incentives influence investors’ decisions on biomass co-firing combined with carbon capture and storage retrofit projects for coal-fired power plants?49 cited
2022Using Real Options Thinking to Value Investment Flexibility in Carbon Capture and Utilization Projects: A Review31 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work