References

• 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
• 2017Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review605 cited
• 2012Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact479 cited
• 2014Publish or perish: Where are we heading?386 cited
• 2017Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective303 cited
• 2002Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance302 cited
• 1997Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation262 cited
• 2006Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance250 cited
• 1996Impact factors can mislead227 cited
• 2018Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability213 cited
• 2013Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access167 cited
• 2002Gender bias in the refereeing process?141 cited
• 2016Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research134 cited
• 2013Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures120 cited
• 2002Open access to the scientific journal literature.