SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reconsidering reviews: the role of scoping reviews in digital medicine and pediatrics
7 references·0 citing·28 second hop
Reconsidering reviews: the role of scoping reviews in digital medicine and pediatrics (2020)Reconsidering reviews: the role of scopin…Teenagers, screens and social media: a narrative review of reviews and key studies (2020)Teenagers, screens and social…The common sense census: media use by tweens and teens (2015)The common sense census: medi…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (2013)Enhancing the scoping study m…A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2010)A descriptive analysis of chi…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Evidence Base for Interventions Delivered to Children in Primary Care: An Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews (2011)Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations? (2017)A Decade of Efforts to Add Value to Child Health Research Practices (2023)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Understanding scoping reviews (2016)Embodied Conversational Agents in Clinical Psychology: A Scoping Review (2017)The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites (2007)Increases in Depressive Symptoms, Suicide-Related Outcomes, and Suicide Rates Among U.S. Adolescents After 2010 and Links to Increased New Media Screen Time (2017)A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents (2019)Computer-Mediated Communication, Social Media, and Mental Health: A Conceptual and Empirical Meta-Review (2020)The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent (2020)Problematic Social Media Use in Adolescents and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2022)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Media use and brain development during adolescence (2018)The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition (2019)Smartphone addiction is increasing across the world: A meta-analysis of 24 countries (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,074 cited
  • 2013Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework1,889 cited
  • 2015The common sense census: media use by tweens and teens900 cited
  • 2020Teenagers, screens and social media: a narrative review of reviews and key studies703 cited
  • 2010A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews24 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work