The Archives, Archivist, Archival Culture: Idea, Metaphor, Rise of the Future Image

Abstract

The tendencies of the evolution of the Archives as the institution, the social phenomenon and the space of memory, peculiarities of its content in the conditions of the informational e-environment are highlighted. It is noted on some points in the development of the theory and practice of archival science, focused on the idea of archives and archivist. The focus is on the main stages of the formation of the status of archivist in society and in the state. It is indicated on the necessity of development of archival culture and archival advocacy. References: Assman, A. (2012). Prostory spohadu. Formy ta transformatsii kulturnoi pamiati. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr. [in Ukrainian]. Bezdrabko, V. (2011). Istoriia nauky pro dokument, abo Vidkryttia vidomoho. Kyiv: Chetverta khvylia. [in Ukrainian]. Bonifatsio (2011). «De archivis» (M. Yu. Bilous, Comp.). Arkhivy Ukrainy, 2/3, 222–237. Booms, H. (1972). Gesellschaftsordnung und Uberlieferungsbildung: Zue Problematik archivarischer Qvellenbewertung. Archivalische Zeitschrift, 68, 3–40. [in German]. https://doi.org/10.7788/az.1972.68.1.3 Booms, H. (1987). Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources. Archivaria, 24, 69–107. [in English]. Brenneke, А. (2018). Gestalten des Archivs. Nachgelassene Schriften zur Archivwissenschaft. In Herausgegeben und mit einem Nachwort versehen von Dietmar Schenk (pp. 9). Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. [in German]. Carr, E. H. (1962). What is History? [in English]. Den forsta arkivlaran. ARKIV: en tidskrift om arkivets alla aspekter. Retrieved from http://www.temaarkiv.se/den-forsta-arkivlaran/ [in Swedish] Den forsta arkivlaran. ARKIV: en tidskrift om arkivets alla aspekter. Retrieved from http://www.temaarkiv.se/den-forsta-arkivlaran/ [in Swedish] DSTU 2732:2004. Dilovodstvo i arkhivna sprava. Terminy ta vyznachennia poniat (2005). Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart. [in Ukrainian]. Duranti, (2007). Models of Archival Education: Four, Two, One, or a Thousand? Archives & Social Studies: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 1, 47. [in English]. Dzhenkinson, H. (1934). Rukovodstvo po arkhivovedeniiu i problema sozdaniia novykh arkhivov. Moskva. [in Russian]. Eckhart, G. (1974). Einfuhrung in die Archivkunde. Darmstadt. [in German]. Flinn, A. (2011). Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 7, 7. [in English]. Gilliland, A. J. (2017). Designing Expert Systems for Archival Evaluation and Processing of Computer-Mediated Communications: Frameworks and Methods. Research in the Archival Multiverse. Clayton: Monash University. [in English]. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_628143 Groys, B. (1992). Ueber das Neue. Versuch einer Kulturoekonomie. Muenchen. [in German]. Jenkinson, H. (1922). A Manual of Archive Administration, including the problems of war-archives and archivemaking. London–Edinburgh–New York–Toronto–Melburne–Bombay: Oxford at Clarendon Press. [in English]. Karsavin, L. P. (1920). Vvedenie v istoriiu: teoriia istorii. Petrograd: Nauka i shkola. [in Russian]. Klymova, K. (2019). Rozvytok arkhivnoi terminolohii: tendentsii ta faktory vplyvu. In Terminolohiia dokumentoznavstva ta sumizhnykh haluzei znan: zbirnyk naukovykg prats. Kyiv: Chetverta khvylia. [in Ukrainian]. Langlua, Sh.-V. & Senobos, Sh. (1899). Vvedenie v izuchenie istorii. Sankt-Peterburg. [in Russian]. Lappo-Danilevskiy, A. S. (1913). Metodologiia istorii, 2, 369–371. [in Russian]. Levchenko, L. (2013). Arkhivy i arkhivna sprava Spoluchenykh Shtativ Ameryky: istoriia ta orhanizatsiia. Mykolaiv: Ilion. [in Ukrainian]. Maher, W. J. (1998). Archives, Archivists and Society. American Archivist, 61(2), 253. [in English]. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.61.2.f1555w1738v134n2 Matiash, I. (2012). Arkhivoznavstvo: metodolohichni zasady ta istoriia rozvytku. Kyiv: Vydavnychy dim «Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia». [in Ukrainian]. Medushevskaia, O. M. (1964). Voprosy teorii istochnikovedeniya v sovremennoi francuzskoi burzhuaznoi istoriografii. Voprosy istorii, 8, 80. [in Russian]. Paliienko, M. (2016), Arkhivna systema Avstrii: istorychni vytoky, evoliutsiia, suchasna orhanizatsiia. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 1, 187–210. [in Ukrainian]. Paliienko, M. (2015). Arkhivna systema Turechchyny: stanovlennia, evoliutsiia, suchasna orhanizatsiia. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 2, 209–228. [in Ukrainian]. Paliienko, M. (2012). Arkhivna systema Yaponii: osoblyvosti formuvannia, struktura, tendentsii rozvytku. Movni i kontseptualni kartyny svitu, 40, 314–317. [in Ukrainian]. Paliienko, M. (2016). Obraz arkhivu v suchasnomu naukovomu dyskursi: mnozhynnist interpretatsii. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 5(6), 136–152. [in Ukrainian]. Paliienko, M. (2011). Osoblyvosti zberihannia dokumentalnoi spadschyny u Velykobrytanii: istorychni tradytsii ta suchasna orhanizatsiia. Studii z arkhivnoi spravy ta dokumentoznavstva, 19(1), 43–47. [in Ukrainian]. Prykhodko, L. F. (2013). Formuvannia fondovoho pryntsypu orhanizatsii arkhivnykh dokumentiv u zarubizhnomu arkhivoznavstvi druhoi polovyny XIX st. – pochatku XX st. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 2, 5–47. [in Ukrainian]. Prykhodko, L. F. (2013). Pytannia ekspertyzy tsinnosti arkhivnykh dokumentiv: zarubizhny dosvid na pratsiakh Kh. Dzhenkinsona. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 21, 18–31. [in Ukrainian]. Prykhodko, L. F. (2012). Rozvytok arkhivnoi spravy ta arkhivoznavchoi dumky Frantsii u XVIII – pochatku XIX st. Studii z arkhivnoi spravy ta dokumentoznavstva, 20, 16–35. [in Ukrainian]. Pushkarev, L. N. (1968). Opredelenie istoricheskogo istochnika v russkoj istoriografii XVIII–XIX vv. Arkheograficheskiy ezhegodnik za 1966 g., 82. [in Russian]. Rakitov, A. I. (1969). Anatomiia nauchnogo znaniya: populiarnoe vvedenie v logiku i metodologiiu nauki. Moskva: Politizdat. [in Russian]. Schellenberg, T. (1956). Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [in English]. Schellenberg, T. (1965). The Management of Archives. New York: Columbia University [in English]. Senobos, Sh. (1902). Istoricheskii metod v primenenii k socialnym naukam (P. S. Kogan, Trans.). Moskva: T-vo tip. A. I. Mamontova. [in Russian]. Shellenberg, T. (1962). Sovremennye arkhivy. Principy i metody raboty (V. A. Aleshkovskoj, E. G. Baskakova, N. D. Boldyrevoj, Trans.). Moskva. [in Russian]. Sсhellenberg, T. (1956). Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [in English]. Terminologie der Archivwissenschaft. Archivschule Marburg. Retrieved from https:// archivschule.de/uploads/Forschung/ArchivwissenschaftlicheTerminologie/ [in German]. Terminologie der Archivwissenschaft. Archivschule Marburg. Retrieved from https:// archivschule.de/uploads/Forschung/ArchivwissenschaftlicheTerminologie/ [in German]. Update on the Twitter Archive at the Library of Congress (2013). Library of Congress, 1–5. [in English]. Volkotrub, O. (2014). Pidhotovka u SShA fakhivtsiv dlia arkhivnykh ustanov. Naukovi pratsi istorychnoho fakultetu Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 41, 155–160. [in Ukrainian]. Volkotrub, O. (2011). Teodor Shellenberh – fundator novykh osvitnikh prohram v haluzi arkhivnoi ta bibliotechnoi spravy Pivnichnoi Ameryky. Visnyk Odeskoho istoryko-kraieznavchoho muzeiu, 10, 67. [in Ukrainian]. Weidling, T. (2013). Den aldsta arkivlaran: Jacob von Rammingens bada larobocker i registraturoch arkivskotsel fran 1571, samt en monografi om arkiv fran 1632 av Baldassare Bonifacio. Scandinavian Journal of History, 38:2, 270–272. [in Swedish]. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2013.776405 Zechel, (1965). Probleme einer Wissenschaftstheorie der Archivistik mit besonderer Berucksichtigung des Archivwesens der Wirtschaft. Tradition: Zeitschrift fur Firmengeschichte und Unternehmerbiographie, 10(5/6), 298. [in German]. https://doi.org/10.1515/zug-1965-5-612 Zhiying, L. (2017). A History of Archival Ideas and Practice in China. In Research in the Archival Multiverse (pp. 96–122). Clayton: Monash [in English].

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.