Universal Health Coverage for Non-communicable Diseases and Health Equity: Lessons From Australian Primary Healthcare

M. Fisher · Toby Freeman · Tamara Mackean · Sharon Friel · Fran Elaine Baum

51 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Healthcare Systems and Reforms Primary Care and Health Outcomes Healthcare Systems and Practices

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Universal health coverage (UHC) is central to current international debate on health policy. The primary healthcare (PHC) system is crucial to achieving UHC, in order to address the rising incidence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) more effectively and equitably. In this paper, we examine the Australian case as a mature system of UHC and identify lessons for UHC policy to support equity of access to PHC and reduce NCDs. METHODS: Our qualitative research used policy mapping and monitoring and 30 key informant interviews, and applied policy theory, to investigate the implementation of Australian PHC policy between 2008 and 2018. RESULTS: Although the Australian PHC system does support equity of access to primary medical care, other ideational, actor-centred and structural features of policy detract from the capacities of the system to prevent and manage NCDs effectively, deliver equity of access according to need, and support equity in health outcomes. These features include a dominant focus on episodic primary medical care, which is a poor model of care for NCDs, and an inequitable distribution of these services. Also, a mixed system of public and private insurance coverage in PHC contributes to inequities in access and health outcomes, driving additional NCD demand into the health system. CONCLUSION: Countries aiming to achieve UHC to support health equity and reduce NCDs can learn from strengths and weaknesses in the Australian system. We recommend a range of ideational, actor-centred and structural features of UHC systems in PHC that will support effective action on NCDs, equity of access to care according to need, and equity in health outcomes across geographically and ethnically diverse populations.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 51 citations exist upstream.

References

1984Case Study Research: Design and Methods 1996Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems 2003Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance 1992The Concepts and Principles of Equity and Health 2003Defining equity in health 1991The concepts and principles of equity and health 2015Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism 2002Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance

Cited by

2022Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Theories of Wellbeing and Their Suitability for Wellbeing Policy

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.