Citation map · Study

Effectiveness of hospital clowns for symptom management in paediatrics: systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials

16 references·0 citing·35 second hopsampled

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
2014PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews2,694 cited
2005External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”2,541 cited
2007Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals1,056 cited
2005Clown Doctors as a Treatment for Preoperative Anxiety in Children: A Randomized, Prospective Study371 cited
2013Non‐randomized studies as a source of complementary, sequential or replacement evidence for randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions248 cited
2016Therapeutic clowns in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.