Empiricism at the Crossroads: The Vienna Circle's Protocol-Sentence Debate

Thomas Uebel

102 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy, Science, and History Philosophy and History of Science Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Abstract

"Reconstructs and analyzes the Vienna Circle's protocol-sentence debate and the positions of the central theorists involved: Moritz Schlick, Rudolf Carnap, and Otto Neurath"--Provided by publisher.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 102 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2014The Realistic Empiricism of Mach, James, and Russell: Neutral Monism Reconceived 2013“Logical Positivism”—“Logical Empiricism”: What's in a Name?2015Is it possible to give scientific solutions to Grand Challenges? On the idea of grand challenges for life science research 2016Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle 2008Writing a Revolution: On the Production and Early Reception of the Vienna Circle's Manifesto 2011Feigl's ‘Scientific Realism’2012The Vienna Circle’s “Scientific World-Conception”: Philosophy of Science in the Political Arena 2020Intersubjective Accountability: Politics and Philosophy in the Left Vienna Circle

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.