Commentary: the perils and promise of inter-paradigmatic dialogues on remunicipalisation

Abstract

Many epistemological perils of inter-paradigmatic dialogues originate from the ontological divides between schools of thought. Seeing through these cultural barriers does however offer the promise of inter-paradigmatic learning. This paper aims to suggest some basic conditions for seizing the learning opportunities that come from the competition, emulation, assimilation and regeneration of ideas across paradigms. It does so by looking at the case of the incipient dialogue between the heterodox and neoinstitutional traditions of remunicipalisation. These traditions diverge over the nature and societal implications of remunicipalisation as reverse privatisation. We thus identify three fundamental attributes of fruitful inter-paradigmatic dialogues: reflexivity as subjective predisposition to critical and self-critical inquiry within and across schools of thought; immanent critique as inquiry of the consistency between the beliefs and intentions held by the members of a school of thought and their intellectual practices; and, recursiveness as persistence in expanding learning opportunities through sustained inter-paradigmatic dialogue.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.