Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Rate the Raters: A Note on Wine Judge Consistency

6 references·7 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2008An Examination of Judge Reliability at a major U.S. Wine Competition146 cited
2012Reliability and Consensus of Experienced Wine Judges: Expertise Within and Between?72 cited
2013Is There Consensus Among Wine Quality Ratings of Prominent Critics? An Empirical Analysis of Red Bordeaux, 2004–201046 cited
2013Criteria for Accrediting Expert Wine Judges18 cited
2012804 Tastes: Evidence on Preferences, Randomness, and Value from Double-Blind Wine Tastings15 cited
2018Consensus between Ratings of Red Bordeaux Wines by Prominent Critics and Correlations with Prices 2004–2010 and 2011–2016: Ashton Revisited and Expanded15 cited

Cited by

2022Judging reliability at wine and water competitions8 cited
2022Stochastic error and biases remain in blind wine ratings5 cited
2020The Legacy of Gurus: The Impact of Armin Diel and Joel Payne on Winery Ratings in Germany4 cited
2024Explaining wine scores through stochastic frontier analysis. An intent to measure sensory non-observable attributes2 cited
2025Are Canada’s best wines from Ontario or British Columbia? An analysis of the All Canadian Wine Championships results, 2010–20221 cited
2026Wine Quality as a Source of Information Asymmetry: Signals, Screens, and the Role of Emerging Technologies1 cited
2023Experience goods and the role of experts : recommendation effects on wine purchasing decision

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

0 cited