SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: An International Survey of Researchers
8 references·2 citing·44 second hop
Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: An International Survey of Researchers (2021)Improving the Reporting of Primary Care R…Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014 (2016)Update on the endorsement of …A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network (2016)A history of the evolution of…Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Transparent reporting of a mu…STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)STARD 2015: An Updated List o…The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensu…Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Transparent and accurate repo…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research (2008)Helping editors, peer reviewe…Key items for reports of primary care research: an international Delphi study (2022)Key items for reports of prim…Mapping the literature on primary care research reporting: a scoping review (2020)Mapping the literature on pri…Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures (2000)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models (2017)Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The MAPS Reporting Statement for Studies Mapping onto Generic Preference-Based Outcome Measures: Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Reporting of method comparison studies: a review of advice, an assessment of current practice, and specific suggestions for future reports (2016)PRIRATE 2020 guidelines for reporting randomized trials in Endodontics: a consensus‐based development (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension (2020)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations (2022)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations (2022)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations (2022)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study (2017)Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers (2018)TREND Reporting Guidelines for Nonrandomized/Quasi-Experimental Study Designs (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Consensus-based recommendations for case report in Chinese medicine (CARC) (2016)CAse-BAsed REview sTandards (CABARET): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors (2024)LETter To the EditoR Standards (LETTERS): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors (2024)Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement3,296 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2015STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies1,346 cited
  • 2013The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development746 cited
  • 2010Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network589 cited
  • 2016A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network174 cited
  • 2016Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014167 cited
  • 2008Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research153 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Mapping the literature on primary care research reporting: a scoping review7 cited
  • 2022Key items for reports of primary care research: an international Delphi study7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work