SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality assessment of real-world data repositories across the data life cycle: A literature review
2 references·3 citing·23 second hop
Quality assessment of real-world data repositories across the data life cycle: A literature review (2020)Quality assessment of real-world data rep…Trust in a specific technology (2011)Trust in a specific technologyBeyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers (1996)Beyond Accuracy: What Data Qu…Data Quality–Driven Improvement in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review (2024)Data Quality–Driven Improveme…A scoping review on quality assessment tools used in systematic reviews and meta-analysis of real-world studies (2023)A scoping review on quality a…Linking a Consortium-Wide Data Quality Assessment Tool with the MIRACUM Metadata Repository (2021)Linking a Consortium-Wide Dat…Out of the Crisis (1982)Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation (1991)Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable (1992)Data quality assessment (2002)The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach (2002)Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships (2008)Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error (1981)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (2003)Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and future research directions (2021)My Chatbot Companion - a Study of Human-Chatbot Relationships (2021)Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologies (2022)Data quality in context (1997)Juran's quality handbook (1999)knitr: A Comprehensive Tool for Reproducible Research in R (2018)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Development of quality assessment tool for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of real-world studies: a Delphi consensus survey (2024)The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for Assessing the Quality of Studies in Systematic Reviews (2026)A product perspective on total data quality management (1998)A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems (2014)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers4,663 cited
  • 2011Trust in a specific technology1,248 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Data Quality–Driven Improvement in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review26 cited
  • 2021Linking a Consortium-Wide Data Quality Assessment Tool with the MIRACUM Metadata Repository26 cited
  • 2023A scoping review on quality assessment tools used in systematic reviews and meta-analysis of real-world studies14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work