Verbal Autopsy Methods with Multiple Causes

Abstract

Verbal autopsy procedures are widely used for estimating cause- specific mortality in areas without medical death certification. Data on symp- toms reported by caregivers along with the cause of death are collected from a medical facility, and the cause-of-death distribution is estimated in the pop- ulation where only symptom data are available. Current approaches analyze only one cause at a time, involve assumptions judged difficult or impossible to satisfy, and require expensive, time-consuming, or unreliable physician re- views, expert algorithms, or parametric statistical models. By generalizing current approaches to analyze multiple causes, we show how most of the dif- ficult assumptions underlying existing methods can be dropped. These gen- eralizations also make physician review, expert algorithms and parametric statistical assumptions unnecessary. With theoretical results, and empirical analyses in data from China and Tanzania, we illustrate the accuracy of this approach. While no method of analyzing verbal autopsy data, including the more computationally intensive approach offered here, can give accurate es- timates in all circumstances, the procedure offered is conceptually simpler, less expensive, more general, as or more replicable, and easier to use in prac- tice than existing approaches. We also show how our focus on estimating aggregate proportions, which are the quantities of primary interest in verbal autopsy studies, may also greatly reduce the assumptions necessary for, and thus improve the performance of, many individual classifiers in this and other areas. As a companion to this paper, we also offer easy-to-use software that implements the methods discussed herein.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 94 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.