SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Judicial disharmony: A study of dissent · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleJudicial disharmony: A study of dissent

Anthony Niblett2015

OA

Articlegreen2015

Judicial disharmony: A study of dissent

Anthony Niblett · Albert H. Yoon

31 citations·0/0 files stored·International Review of Law and Economics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Judicial and Constitutional Studies Legal processes and jurisprudence Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

References

1979Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce 2002The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited 2002Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 2003The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited 1993What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does)2007The Judicial Common Space 1998Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals 2004Ideological Voting on Federal Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Investigation

Cited by

2020Computational Methods in Legal Analysis 2019Dissent Aversion and Sequential Voting in the Brazilian Supreme Court 2017Triaging the Law: Developing the Common Law on the Supreme Court of India 2023The Elevator Effect

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

20101 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquirychapter · 11 shared references 20109 In Praise of Pedantic Eclecticism: Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Psychology of Judgingchapter · 11 shared references 20105 Judges as Members of Small Groupschapter · 10 shared references 20103 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoningchapter · 10 shared references 201010 Judges, Expertise, and Analogychapter · 10 shared references 2008The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the United States Courts of Appealspreprint · 9 shared references

Details

Year2015

Typearticle

Published2015-01-08

VenueInternational Review of Law and Economics

ISSN-L0144-8188

Languageen

Citations31

Files0 public / 0

ShelfJudicial and Constitutional Studies

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.irle.2014.12.002

openalex_workW3123972216

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.