SStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access My library Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Hidden 'Judiciary': An Empirical Examination of Executive Branch Justice · Study

Home/Judicial and Constitutional Studies

The Hidden 'Judiciary': An Empirical Examination of Executive Branch Justice

Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey John Rachlinski, Andrew J. Wistrich

2009-01-01preprintSSRN Electronic Journal51 citationsgreen

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Judicial and Constitutional Studies Administrative Law and Governance Legal processes and jurisprudence

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 51 citations exist upstream.

References

1980Unrealistic optimism about future life events.

2007Error and bias in comparative judgment: On being both better and worse than we think we are.

1993When every relationship is above average: Perceptions and expectations of divorce at the time of marriage.

2005Error and Bias in Comparative Judgment: On Being Both Better and Worse than We Think We are

Cited by

2017In the eyes of the law: Perception versus reality in appraisals of video evidence.

2017Implicit Bias in Judicial Decision Making How It Affects Judgment and What Judges Can Do About It

2016Judges, ‘common sense’ and judicial cognition

2017Implicit Bias in Judicial Decision Making How It Affects Judgment and What Judges Can Do About It

2012The Australian High Court and Social Facts: A Content Analysis Study

2013Judicial Decisionmaking: A Behavioral Perspective

2023All's well that ends well? Outcome bias in pilots during instrument flight rules

2024Judicial Decision-Making

Details

Year2009

Typepreprint

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal

Languageen

Files0 public / 0

Identifiers

doi10.2139/ssrn.1374346

openalex_workW3124200898

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.