The Impact of Graphical Displays of Pro Forma Earnings Information on Professional and Nonprofessional Investors' Earnings Judgments

William N. Dilla · Diane Joyce Janvrin · Cynthia G. Jeffrey

83 citations0/0 files storedBehavioral Research in Accounting

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting Financial Reporting and XBRL

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Regulation G (SEC 2003b) requires managers to reconcile textual non-GAAP performance measures (i.e., pro forma disclosures) to GAAP. Graphical disclosures also require reconciliation; however, neither the format nor the placement of the reconciliation is specified. We apply cognitive fit theory to argue that the influence of graphical information presentation formats is contingent on investor type and judgment complexity. Participants in our study viewed a simulated Investor Relations website for a large drug retailer and made judgments regarding current fiscal year earnings performance, earnings potential, and investment amount. We manipulated graphical (GAAP-only versus GAAP and pro forma) and textual (GAAP-only versus pro forma reconciled to GAAP) earnings disclosure content in a 2 × 2 between-participants design. We find that nonprofessional investors' current fiscal year earnings performance, earnings potential, and investment amount judgments are all influenced by graphical displays, which include pro forma as opposed to GAAP-only earnings information. Graphical displays of pro forma earnings information do not influence professional investors' current year earnings performance judgments; however, these displays do influence professional investors' earnings potential and investment amount judgments because they are more complex. Our results suggest a need to further examine the influence of graphical pro forma earnings presentation formats on investor judgments. Data Availability: Contact the first author.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 83 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices*1981Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgement and Choice 1982Contingent decision behavior.2002Experimental research in financial accounting 1978A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies 2000Effects of Comprehensive-Income Characteristics on Nonprofessional Investors' Judgments: The Role of Financial-Statement Presentation Format 1983Strategies for multiattribute binary choice.2004Does Search-Facilitating Technology Improve the Transparency of Financial Reporting?

Cited by

2015Nonfinancial Information Preferences of Professional Investors 2017The impact of corporate social responsibility assurance on investor decisions: Chinese evidence 2014The drivers, consequences and policy implications of non-GAAP earnings reporting 2018Auditing Complex Estimates: How Do Construal Level and Evidence Formatting Impact Auditors' Consideration of Inconsistent Evidence?2017Impression Management and Retrospective Sense-Making in Corporate Annual Reports: Banks’ Graphical Reporting During the Global Financial Crisis

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.