SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Publication Bias and Editorial Statement on Negative Findings
16 references·16 citing·42 second hopsampled
Publication Bias and Editorial Statement on Negative Findings (2020)Publication Bias and Editorial Statement …Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research (2018)Transparency, Reproducibility…The Power of Bias in Economics Research (2017)The Power of Bias in Economic…Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project (2016)Replication in Empirical Econ…Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics (2016)Evaluating replicability of l…Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back (2015)Star Wars: The Empirics Strik…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer (2014)Publication bias in the socia…Reshaping Institutions: Evidence on Aid Impacts Using a Preanalysis Plan* (2012)Reshaping Institutions: Evide…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive Psychology“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences (2010)“Positive” Results Increase D…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Time-Series Minimum-Wage Studies: A Meta-analysis (2007)Time-Series Minimum-Wage Stud…Meta‐Regression Methods for Detecting and Estimating Empirical Effects in the Presence of Publication Selection* (2007)Meta‐Regression Methods for D…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Beyond Publication Bias (2005)Beyond Publication BiasBalanced examination of positive publication bias impact (2025)Balanced examination of posit…Do Preregistration and Preanalysis Plans Reduce p-Hacking and Publication Bias? Evidence from 15,992 Test Statistics and Suggestions for Improvement (2024)Do Preregistration and Preana…Unpacking p-Hacking and Publication Bias (2023)Unpacking p-Hacking and Publi…The Null Result Penalty (2023)The Null Result PenaltySelective and (mis)leading economics journals: Meta‐research evidence (2023)Selective and (mis)leading ec…Intertemporal substitution in labor supply: A meta-analysis (2023)Intertemporal substitution in…Does sentiment affect stock returns? A meta-analysis across survey-based measures (2023)Does sentiment affect stock r…All-pervading insider bias alters review time in Turkish university journals (2023)All-pervading insider bias al…Did Ohio’s Vaccine Lottery Increase Vaccination Rates? A Pre-Registered, Synthetic Control Study (2022)Did Ohio’s Vaccine Lottery In…Academic favoritism at work: insider bias in Turkish national journals (2022)Academic favoritism at work: …Reporting all results efficiently: A RARE proposal to open up the file drawer (2021)Reporting all results efficie…Measuring capital-labor substitution: The importance of method choices and publication bias (2021)Measuring capital-labor subst…How puzzling is the forward premium puzzle? A meta-analysis (2021)How puzzling is the forward p…The Matthew effect of a journal's ranking (2020)The Matthew effect of a journ…The effectiveness of psychological skills training and behavioral interventions in sport using single-case designs: A meta regression analysis of the peer-reviewed studies (2020)The effectiveness of psycholo…Negative results provide valuable evidence for conservation (2020)Negative results provide valu…Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Reflections on the Natural Rate Hypothesis (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)A Meta-Analysis of the International Gender Wage Gap (2005)A meta-analysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies (2008)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)The Generalizability of Survey Experiments (2015)The natural selection of bad science (2016)A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management (2017)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation (2017)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of the Minimum Wage. (1996)Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Reply (2000)Publication Selection Bias in Minimum‐Wage Research? A Meta‐Regression Analysis (2009)WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM THREE DECADES OF RESEARCH ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF PUBLIC CAPITAL? (2013)Climate and Conflict (2015)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The New Statistics (2013)z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments (2007)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A Unified Welfare Analysis of Government Policies* (2020)Financial education affects financial knowledge and downstream behaviors (2021)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2014Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer1,539 cited
  • 2016Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics1,314 cited
  • 2005Beyond Publication Bias745 cited
  • 2010“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences733 cited
  • 2007Time-Series Minimum-Wage Studies: A Meta-analysis650 cited
  • 2017The Power of Bias in Economics Research634 cited
  • 2007Meta‐Regression Methods for Detecting and Estimating Empirical Effects in the Presence of Publication Selection*605 cited
  • 2016Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project477 cited
  • 2012Reshaping Institutions: Evidence on Aid Impacts Using a Preanalysis Plan*455 cited
  • 2018Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research448 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back430 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Measuring capital-labor substitution: The importance of method choices and publication bias131 cited
    • 2021How puzzling is the forward premium puzzle? A meta-analysis71 cited
    • 2020The Matthew effect of a journal's ranking60 cited
    • 2020The effectiveness of psychological skills training and behavioral interventions in sport using single-case designs: A meta regression analysis of the peer-reviewed studies55 cited
    • 2023Unpacking p-Hacking and Publication Bias46 cited
    • 2023The Null Result Penalty45 cited
    • 2020Negative results provide valuable evidence for conservation36 cited
    • 2023Does sentiment affect stock returns? A meta-analysis across survey-based measures34 cited
    • 2024Do Preregistration and Preanalysis Plans Reduce p-Hacking and Publication Bias? Evidence from 15,992 Test Statistics and Suggestions for Improvement32 cited
    • 2022Did Ohio’s Vaccine Lottery Increase Vaccination Rates? A Pre-Registered, Synthetic Control Study31 cited
    • 2021Reporting all results efficiently: A RARE proposal to open up the file drawer30 cited
    • 2023Intertemporal substitution in labor supply: A meta-analysis24 cited
    • 2022Academic favoritism at work: insider bias in Turkish national journals22 cited
    • 2023Selective and (mis)leading economics journals: Meta‐research evidence15 cited
    • 2023All-pervading insider bias alters review time in Turkish university journals13 cited
    • 2025Balanced examination of positive publication bias impact11 cited