We find conditions for the Friedman rule to be optimal in three standard monetary models. Our main contribution is to shed light on two issues in the literature. First, the conventional view maintains that when money is a final good, its services should be taxed. Moreover, if money demand is interest-inelastic, its services should be taxed heavily. We show that this view is incorrect. Second, there is an ongoing controversy about whether the optimality of the Friedman rule is connected to the intermediate goods result from public finance. We resolve this controversy by showing a deep connection between these results.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 241 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.