SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An Empirical Study of Patent Litigation Timing: Could a Patent Term Reduction Decimate Trolls Without Harming Innovators?
0 references·16 citing·38 second hop
An Empirical Study of Patent Litigation Timing: Could a Patent Term Reduction Decimate Trolls Without Harming Innovators? (2011)An Empirical Study of Patent Litigation T…Patent litigation and narrative R&D disclosures: Evidence from the adoption of anti-troll legislation (2024)Patent litigation and narrati…Chilling effects of patent trolls (2022)Chilling effects of patent tr…The Effect of Patent Litigation Insurance: Theory and Evidence from NPEs (2021)The Effect of Patent Litigati…Non-practicing entities and transparency of patent ownership in Europe: the case of UK dormant companies (2021)Non-practicing entities and t…Rethinking the Length of Patent Terms (2019)Rethinking the Length of Pate…A study on the time-dependent changes of the intensities of factors determining patent lifespan from a biological perspective (2018)A study on the time-dependent…Patent Litigation Data from US District Court Electronic Records (1963-2015) (2017)Patent Litigation Data from U…Patent Assertion Entities in Europe (2017)Patent Assertion Entities in …An invitation to market design (2017)An invitation to market designThe Surprising Resilience of the Patent System (2016)The Surprising Resilience of …Patent Licensing, Technology Transfer, and Innovation (2016)Patent Licensing, Technology …Patent Assertions: Are We Any Closer to Aligning Reward to Contribution? (2016)Patent Assertions: Are We Any…Patent Assertions: Are We Any Closer to Aligning Reward to Contribution? (2015)Patent Assertions: Are We Any…Patent Assertions: Are We Any Closer to Aligning Reward to Contribution? (2015)Patent Assertions: Are We Any…Threat of Litigation and Patent Value: What Technology Managers Should Know (2013)Threat of Litigation and Pate…Software Patents and the Return of Functional Claiming (2012)Software Patents and the Retu…How Strong Are Weak Patents? (2008)Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking (2016)Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking (2016)Patent Assertion Entities and Legal Exceptionalism in Europe and the United States, a Comparative View (2017)Do Standard-Essential Patent Owners Behave Opportunistically? Evidence From U.S. District Court Dockets (2020)Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office (2001)Injunctions, Hold-Up, and Patent Royalties (2010)The Private and Social Costs of Patent Trolls (2011)THE ROLE OF PATENTS IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES: A SURVEY OF THE LITERATURE (2018)Are Non-Practicing Entities Opportunistic? Evidence from Litigation of Standard Essential Patents (2023)Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors (1995)Startups and Patent Trolls (2012)Patents and Cumulative Innovation: Causal Evidence from the Courts * (2014)Can firms avoid tough patent examiners through examiner‐shopping ? Strategic timing of citations in USPTO patent applications (2022)Economic nationalism and the home court advantage (2024)Interpretive aspects of claim language and patent scope (2025)Prior User Rights (2006)Patent Failure (2009)Missing the Forest for the Trolls (2013)Abnormal Returns to Artificial Intelligence Patent Infringement Litigations (2024)A theory of justice original editionThe Problem of Social Cost (1960)The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism (1970)STANDARD SETTING, PATENTS, AND HOLD-UP (2007)Patent privateering, litigation, and R&D incentives (2017)Royalty Stacking and Standard Essential Patents: Theory and Evidence from the World Mobile Wireless Industry (2017)Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy (1986)The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988)New York University Law Review (2017)The Patent Troll: Benign Middleman or Stick-Up Artist? (2019)Welcome to Waco! The Impact of Judge Shopping on Litigation (2022)Litigation and Settlement under Imperfect Information (1984)How do patent trolls affect the technological innovation of Chinese enterprises? Evidence from enterprise patent survey data in China (2022)Driving the Green Transformation of Enterprises: The Role of Patent Insurance (2024)Using daily stock returns (1985)Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks (1999)Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth* (2017)Configuration paths to high-value patents: evidence from patents winning the China Patent Awards (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017An invitation to market design70 cited
  • 2012Software Patents and the Return of Functional Claiming60 cited
  • 2016Patent Licensing, Technology Transfer, and Innovation49 cited
  • 2022Chilling effects of patent trolls46 cited
  • 2017Patent Assertion Entities in Europe45 cited
  • 2021The Effect of Patent Litigation Insurance: Theory and Evidence from NPEs41 cited
  • 2015Patent Assertions: Are We Any Closer to Aligning Reward to Contribution?36 cited
  • 2016Patent Assertions: Are We Any Closer to Aligning Reward to Contribution?33 cited
  • 2017Patent Litigation Data from US District Court Electronic Records (1963-2015)32 cited
  • 2015Patent Assertions: Are We Any Closer to Aligning Reward to Contribution?30 cited
  • 2013Threat of Litigation and Patent Value: What Technology Managers Should Know27 cited
  • 2018A study on the time-dependent changes of the intensities of factors determining patent lifespan from a biological perspective15 cited
  • 2021Non-practicing entities and transparency of patent ownership in Europe: the case of UK dormant companies13 cited
  • 2024Patent litigation and narrative R&D disclosures: Evidence from the adoption of anti-troll legislation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

11 cited
  • 2016The Surprising Resilience of the Patent System11 cited
  • 2019Rethinking the Length of Patent Terms11 cited