SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Where Do Early Career Researchers Stand on Open Science Practices? A Survey Within the Max Planck Society
16 references·9 citing·39 second hop
Where Do Early Career Researchers Stand on Open Science Practices? A Survey Within the Max Planck Society (2021)Where Do Early Career Researchers Stand o…Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open science challenges, bene…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…The preregistration revolution (2018)The preregistration revolutionOpen science, reproducibility, and transparency in ecology (2018)Open science, reproducibility…Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Open Science now: A systemati…Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Assessing scientists for hiri…Artificial intelligence faces reproducibility crisis (2018)Artificial intelligence faces…Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices (2017)Early career researchers and …A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention (2015)The open access advantage con…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Registered Reports (2014)Registered ReportsReinventing discovery: the new era of networked science (2012)Reinventing discovery: the ne…Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey (2012)Intended and unintended conse…Ten simple rules for good model-sharing practices (2025)Ten simple rules for good mod…Special Education Researchers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Reported Use of Open Practices (2024)Special Education Researchers…Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine researchers’ practices and perceived barriers related to open science: An international, cross-sectional survey (2024)Complementary, alternative, a…Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers (2023)Toward equitable open researc…Exploring enablers and barriers to implementing the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines: a theory-based survey of journal editors (2023)Exploring enablers and barrie…Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Survey (2022)Open Science Practices in Com…How communication scholars see open scholarship (2022)How communication scholars se…Development of the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure awareness and uptake of Open Research practices (2022)Development of the Brief Open…Improving evidence-based practice through preregistration of applied research: Barriers and recommendations (2021)Improving evidence-based prac…False-Positive Psychology (2011)At what sample size do correlations stabilize? (2013)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template (2016)Exploratory Research (2020)Misinformation in and about science (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Toward a new economics of science (1994)Open innovation : researching a new paradigm (2006)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review (2020)The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support (2020)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (2016)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)ITK: enabling reproducible research and open science (2014)Why should we promote public engagement with science? (2014)Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)Insights From “The Machine Stops ” to Better Understand Rational Assumptions in Algorithmic Decision Making and Its Implications for Organizations (2019)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)The AI gambit: leveraging artificial intelligence to combat climate change—opportunities, challenges, and recommendations (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2018The preregistration revolution1,972 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2014Registered Reports716 cited
  • 2018Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition709 cited
  • 2012Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science645 cited
  • 2019Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond605 cited
  • 2018Artificial intelligence faces reproducibility crisis567 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review559 cited
  • 2018Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure461 cited
  • 2012Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey355 cited
  • 2015The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention258 cited
  • 2018Open science, reproducibility, and transparency in ecology224 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2017Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices189 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers39 cited
    • 2021Improving evidence-based practice through preregistration of applied research: Barriers and recommendations30 cited
    • 2022How communication scholars see open scholarship20 cited
    • 2023Exploring enablers and barriers to implementing the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines: a theory-based survey of journal editors20 cited
    • 2022Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Survey19 cited
    • 2024Special Education Researchers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Reported Use of Open Practices17 cited
    • 2024Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine researchers’ practices and perceived barriers related to open science: An international, cross-sectional survey15 cited
    • 2022Development of the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure awareness and uptake of Open Research practices9 cited
    • 2025Ten simple rules for good model-sharing practices8 cited