Mental health therapists’ perceived barriers to addressing intimate partner violence and suicide.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intimate partner violence (IPV) and suicide are pressing public health issues, yet their intersection in mental health care settings is understudied. We conducted a qualitative study to characterize mental health therapists' personal and system barriers in preparation for an upcoming training curriculum seeking to help patients address these interconnected issues. METHOD: We partnered with an urban community mental health center in New York to facilitate focus groups grounded in community-based participatory research principles. Twenty-three therapists formed 3 focus groups. Participant responses were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using Bronfenbrenner's socioecological model. We performed a primary qualitative framework analysis, coding for therapist barriers in addressing the intersection of IPV-suicide at individual, relational, community, and societal levels. RESULTS: Therapists perceived numerous barriers in all 4 domains. Individually, some struggled with feelings of helplessness and a lack of appropriate training. At the relational level, therapists expressed apprehension about harming the therapeutic relationship by discussing IPV and suicide at length. From a community perspective, therapists voiced concerns for clients' limited local access to support systems and financial resources. Societal barriers included policy-related limitations such as length of appointment times. DISCUSSION: Community mental health center therapists face considerable barriers working with patients affected by IPV and suicide. The socioecological model is a fitting framework for understanding multisystem barriers at individual, relational, community, and societal levels. A better understanding of these challenges is critical for advancing therapist education, enhancing patient outcomes, and improving health systems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 15 citations exist upstream.