References

• 2018Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies3,255 cited
• 2001A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations1,512 cited
• 2020GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy426 cited
• 2020GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables419 cited
• 2019Development of an interactive web-based tool to conduct and interrogate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: MetaDTA284 cited
• 2020GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Inconsistency, Imprecision, publication bias and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence for test accuracy and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.156 cited
• 2010MetaDAS: A SAS macro for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies80 cited
• 1995Regression methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test data.72 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.