SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open access publishing each year
16 references·8 citing·47 second hop
Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open access publishing each year (2021)Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional…Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)Academic criteria for promoti…Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Topic choice contributes to t…Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis (2019)Article Processing Charge Hyp…Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Potential predatory and legit…Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature (2017)Knowledge sharing in global h…Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices (2017)Early career researchers and …A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …Hybrid open access—A longitudinal study (2016)Hybrid open access—A longitud…Article processing charges in OA journals: relationship between price and quality (2015)Article processing charges in…Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce (2014)Estimates of the Continuously…The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals (2013)The Impact of Article Length …Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Open access: The true cost of…Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)Open access versus subscripti…Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Anatomy of open access publis…Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards (2011)Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Rese…Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)Publication fees in open acce…Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs (2024)Purchase and publish: Early c…Access to evidence-based care: a systematic review of trauma and surgical literature costs across resource settings (2024)Access to evidence-based care…The Changing Medical Publishing Industry: Economics, Expansion, and Equity (2023)The Changing Medical Publishi…Hybrid Gold Open Access Citation Advantage in Clinical Medicine: Analysis of Hybrid Journals in the Web of Science (2023)Hybrid Gold Open Access Citat…Female Dynamics in Authorship of Scientific Publications in the Public Library of Science: A 10-year Bibliometric Analysis of Biomedical Research (2023)Female Dynamics in Authorship…Responsible dissemination of health and medical research: some guidance points (2022)Responsible dissemination of …Neurosurgical Publication—Should We Publish at Any Cost? An In-Depth Analysis of Costs Incurred in Publication (2022)Neurosurgical Publication—Sho…The impact of article processing charge waiver on conducting research in low-income countries (2021)The impact of article process…Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences (2014)How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing (2020)Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Systemic racism and U.S. health care (2014)Women in Academic Science (2014)Ethical Machine Learning in Healthcare (2021)Open Access (2012)Anatomy of green open access (2013)Emerging trends in peer review—a survey (2015)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Stop this waste of people, animals and money (2017)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them (2020)Social media use in the research workflow (2011)Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey (2012)Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers (2017)A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers (2020)Factors influencing researchers’ journal selection decisions (2020)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market (2006)Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. (2020)The ecological and evolutionary consequences of systemic racism in urban environments (2020)Intersectional inequalities in science (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods (2020)Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society (2021)Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023)The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment? (2012)The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open‐access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article‐processing charges in combination with subscriptions (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2011Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards1,081 cited
  • 2019Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists629 cited
  • 2013Open access: The true cost of science publishing524 cited
  • 2012Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact479 cited
  • 2017Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison384 cited
  • 2012Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure364 cited
  • 2011Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal262 cited
  • 2020Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities241 cited
  • 2017Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices189 cited
  • 2019Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis176 cited
  • 2013The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals168 cited
  • 2014Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce160 cited
  • 2017

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature
151 cited
  • 2016Hybrid open access—A longitudinal study126 cited
  • 2015Article processing charges in OA journals: relationship between price and quality119 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Responsible dissemination of health and medical research: some guidance points29 cited
    • 2023The Changing Medical Publishing Industry: Economics, Expansion, and Equity27 cited
    • 2023Hybrid Gold Open Access Citation Advantage in Clinical Medicine: Analysis of Hybrid Journals in the Web of Science16 cited
    • 2024Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs13 cited
    • 2023Female Dynamics in Authorship of Scientific Publications in the Public Library of Science: A 10-year Bibliometric Analysis of Biomedical Research13 cited
    • 2021The impact of article processing charge waiver on conducting research in low-income countries11 cited
    • 2022Neurosurgical Publication—Should We Publish at Any Cost? An In-Depth Analysis of Costs Incurred in Publication10 cited
    • 2024Access to evidence-based care: a systematic review of trauma and surgical literature costs across resource settings8 cited