Citation map · Study

Critical analysis of the reporting quality of randomized trials within Endodontics using the Preferred Reporting Items for RAndomized Trials in Endodontics (PRIRATE) 2020 quality standard checklist

16 references·2 citing·49 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2017bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis16,195 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
2011CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2,342 cited
2010Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement1,391 cited
2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
2012Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis235 cited
2012Authorship Trends and Collaboration Pattern in the Marine Sciences Literature : A Scientometric Study168 cited
2011The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials150 cited
2016Mapping the institutional collaboration network of strategic management research: 1980–2014138 cited
2020PRIRATE 2020 guidelines for reporting randomized trials in Endodontics: a consensus‐based development121 cited
2010An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals94 cited
2019A bibliometric study of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals88 cited
2012The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by