SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Responsible Science Assessment: downplaying indexes, boosting quality
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Responsible Science Assessment: downplaying indexes, boosting quality (2021)Responsible Science Assessment: downplayi…So Much to Read, So Little Time (2016)So Much to Read, So Little Ti…Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Growth rates of modern scienc…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)The rate of growth in scienti…Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science (2008)Why Current Publication Pract…Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Universality of citation dist…Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Comparison of SCImago journal…Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals (2007)Eigenfactor: Measuring the va…Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Theory and practise of the g-…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…The University in Ruins (1997)The University in RuinsThe skewness of science (1992)The skewness of scienceNetworks of Scientific Papers (1965)Scientific peer review (2011)The natural selection of bad science (2016)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Mapping of available health research and development data: what's there, what's missing, and what role is there for a global observatory? (2013)Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews (2015)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact (2013)Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact (2016)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)Management as ideology: the case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education (2005)Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom (2009)On being included: racism and diversity in institutional life (2013)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2006Theory and practise of the g-index2,347 cited
  • 1997The University in Ruins2,196 cited
  • 2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references1,570 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2010The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index964 cited
  • 2008Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact810 cited
  • 1992The skewness of science713 cited
  • 2008Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor558 cited
  • 2008Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science502 cited
  • 2016Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level499 cited
  • 2007Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

463 cited
  • 2016So Much to Read, So Little Time316 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.