SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Psychology and Wikipedia: Measuring Psychology Journals’ Impact by Wikipedia Citations
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Psychology and Wikipedia: Measuring Psychology Journals’ Impact by Wikipedia Citations (2021)Psychology and Wikipedia: Measuring Psych…Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Predatory journals: Who publi…Predatory journals recruit fake editor (2017)Predatory journals recruit fa…Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication (2015)Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed…The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication (2014)The Alleged Crisis and the Il…Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania (2014)Causes for the Persistence of…Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Deep impact: unintended conse…How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management (2012)How journal rankings can supp…Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Impact factor: outdated artef…Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system (2010)Wisdom of the crowd or techni…Good Faith Collaboration (2010)Good Faith CollaborationHistory of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences (2009)History of the journal impact…A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)A Principal Component Analysi…An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility (2006)An empirical examination of W…Internet encyclopaedias go head to head (2005)Internet encyclopaedias go he…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system (1997)‘Improving ratings’: audit in…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Descriptions of Sampling Practices Within Five Approaches to Qualitative Research in Education and the Health Sciences (2014)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)"I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]" (2015)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Human behavior and the principle of least effort (1949)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age (2012)The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations and Adverse Effects (2014)Publish or impoverish (2017)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)What is research collaboration? (1997)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity (2015)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self (1990)Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (1995)Audit culture and Illiberal governance (2008)Trustworthy Online Controlled Experiments (2020)Misinformation in and about science (2021)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (2017)Making replication mainstream (2017)Using multimedia for e‐learning (2017)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (2014)Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact (2014)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process (1990)Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. (1994)Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (2005)Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study (2020)Integrating life cycle assessment and life cycle cost: a review of environmental-economic studies (2021)Smart bibliometrics: an integrated method of science mapping and bibliometric analysis (2022)Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education (2006)Full Disclosure (2007)Public Health and Online Misinformation: Challenges and Recommendations (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2005Internet encyclopaedias go head to head1,978 cited
  • 1997‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system698 cited
  • 2014The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication597 cited
  • 2012How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management581 cited
  • 2009A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures574 cited
  • 2015Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication464 cited
  • 2013Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank440 cited
  • 2011Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?370 cited
  • 2009History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences326 cited
  • 2010Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system295 cited
  • 2018Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?245 cited
  • 2017Predatory journals recruit fake editor238 cited
  • 2010Good Faith Collaboration236 cited
  • 2006

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility
230 cited
  • 2014Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania196 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.