SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Beall's legacy in the battle against predatory publishers
16 references·16 citing·29 second hopsampled
Beall's legacy in the battle against predatory publishers (2021)Beall's legacy in the battle against pred…What I learned from predatory publishers (2017)What I learned from predatory…Time to stop talking about ‘predatory journals’ (2017)Time to stop talking about ‘p…Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do? (2017)Predatory Journals Spamming f…Ranking Predatory Journals; Solve the Problem Instead of Removing It! (2016)Ranking Predatory Journals; S…Essential Information about Predatory Publishers and Journals (2016)Essential Information about P…Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research (2016)Dangerous Predatory Publisher…Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals (2016)Best practices for scholarly …Ban predators from the scientific record (2016)Ban predators from the scient…Spurious alternative impact factors: The scale of the problem from an academic perspective (2015)Spurious alternative impact f…Predatory journals and the breakdown of research cultures (2015)Predatory journals and the br…The Open-Access Movement is Not Really about Open Access (2013)The Open-Access Movement is N…Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access (2013)Predatory publishing is just …Medical Publishing Triage - Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers (2013)Medical Publishing Triage - C…Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing (2013)Investigating journals: The d…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…“Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers (2010)“Predatory” Open-Access Schol…Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions (2023)Cabells' Predatory Reports cr…ACADEMIA SHOULD STOP USING BEALL’S LISTS AND REVIEW THEIR USE IN PREVIOUS STUDIES (2023)ACADEMIA SHOULD STOP USING BE…(Mis-)Classification of 17,721 Journals by an Artificial Intelligence Predatory Journal Detector (2023)(Mis-)Classification of 17,72…Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach (2022)Who are the 100 largest scien…Progressive and degenerative journals: on the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing (2022)Progressive and degenerative …Predatory Journals: Revisiting Beall’s Research (2022)Predatory Journals: Revisitin…Predator Effect (2022)Predator EffectHow to identify predatory journals in a search (2022)How to identify predatory jou…A Survey of the Nurse Rostering Solution Methodologies: The State-of-the-Art and Emerging Trends (2022)A Survey of the Nurse Rosteri…Ten simple rules for avoiding predatory publishing scams (2021)Ten simple rules for avoiding…Signs of divisiveness, discrimination and stigmatization caused by Jeffrey Beall's “predatory” open access publishing blacklists and philosophy (2021)Signs of divisiveness, discri…Scientific publications – the bad, the good, for a fistful of dollars (2021)Scientific publications – the…OPEN ACCESS, RESEARCH COMMUNITIES, AND A DEFENSE AGAINST PREDATORY JOURNALS (2021)OPEN ACCESS, RESEARCH COMMUNI…Is It Worth Teaching Biology Students the Basics of Scientometrics and the Instructions for the Design of Scientific Articles, and If So, Why? (2021)Is It Worth Teaching Biology …An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)An integrated paradigm shift …A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers (2021)A credit-like rating system t…Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists (1983)Predatory journals recruit fake editor (2017)Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey (2019)How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing (2020)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Firm action needed on predatory journals (2015)Revisiting the Term Predatory Open Access Publishing (2019)Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature (2019)Two decades of game concepts in digital learning environments – A bibliometric study and research agenda (2021)A European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2010)Stop this waste of people, animals and money (2017)Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation (2017)How predatory journals leak into PubMed (2018)Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research (2018)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities (2016)Drivers of Article Processing Charges in Open Access (2019)Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers (2017)The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology (2017)What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia? (2018)Reproducibility and Research Integrity (2016)Plagiarism in the Context of Education and Evolving Detection Strategies (2017)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2013Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing349 cited
  • 2017What I learned from predatory publishers306 cited
  • 2013Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access167 cited
  • 2016Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research134 cited
  • 2016Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals132 cited
  • 2016Ban predators from the scientific record126 cited
  • 2013Medical Publishing Triage - Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers125 cited
  • 2017Time to stop talking about ‘predatory journals’105 cited
  • 2017Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do?93 cited
  • 2010“Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers89 cited
  • 2013The Open-Access Movement is Not Really about Open Access86 cited
  • 2016Ranking Predatory Journals; Solve the Problem Instead of Removing It!80 cited
  • 2016Essential Information about Predatory Publishers and Journals77 cited
  • 2015Predatory journals and the breakdown of research cultures73 cited
  • 2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Spurious alternative impact factors: The scale of the problem from an academic perspective
68 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach64 cited
  • 2022A Survey of the Nurse Rostering Solution Methodologies: The State-of-the-Art and Emerging Trends55 cited
  • 2021An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’47 cited
  • 2023Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions35 cited
  • 2021Signs of divisiveness, discrimination and stigmatization caused by Jeffrey Beall's “predatory” open access publishing blacklists and philosophy29 cited
  • 2021A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers29 cited
  • 2022Predatory Journals: Revisiting Beall’s Research27 cited
  • 2023ACADEMIA SHOULD STOP USING BEALL’S LISTS AND REVIEW THEIR USE IN PREVIOUS STUDIES22 cited
  • 2023(Mis-)Classification of 17,721 Journals by an Artificial Intelligence Predatory Journal Detector21 cited
  • 2022Progressive and degenerative journals: on the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing20 cited
  • 2022Predator Effect17 cited
  • 2021OPEN ACCESS, RESEARCH COMMUNITIES, AND A DEFENSE AGAINST PREDATORY JOURNALS13 cited
  • 2021Ten simple rules for avoiding predatory publishing scams13 cited
  • 2021Scientific publications – the bad, the good, for a fistful of dollars12 cited
  • 2021Is It Worth Teaching Biology Students the Basics of Scientometrics and the Instructions for the Design of Scientific Articles, and If So, Why?11 cited
  • 2022How to identify predatory journals in a search11 cited