References

• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
• 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
• 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
• 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
• 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
• 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
• 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
• 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
• 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
• 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
• 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
• 2020CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis1,923 cited
• 2014