Citation map · Study

Use of GRADE in evidence syntheses published in high-impact-factor nutrition journals: A methodological survey

11 references·5 citing·48 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
2017Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 20164,824 cited
2018GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence907 cited
2020CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta‐analysis595 cited
2013Understanding GRADE: an introduction391 cited
2016Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research359 cited
2019Hierarchies of evidence applied to lifestyle Medicine (HEALM): introduction of a strength-of-evidence approach based on a methodological systematic review80 cited
2020Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence71 cited
2018Effects of product reformulation on sugar intake and health—a systematic review and meta-analysis59 cited
2017Scope and quality of Cochrane reviews of nutrition interventions: a cross-sectional study32 cited
2018A scoping review and survey provides the rationale, perceptions, and preferences for the integration of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses and GRADE assessments32 cited

Cited by

2023Perspectives on the application of CONSORT guidelines to randomised controlled trials in nutrition

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work