Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences

8 references·1 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
2015Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place19,694 cited
1989Measurement of health status4,979 cited
2003Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life4,692 cited
1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,677 cited
2005Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results1,567 cited
2014Minimal Clinically Important Difference705 cited
2020COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study587 cited

Cited by

2023The Minimal Clinically Important Difference Changes Greatly Based on the Different Calculation Methods184 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work