Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review

5 references·3 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
2019Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM189 cited
2015Perceptions and Incidence of Test Anxiety90 cited
2020Quantifying professionalism in peer review68 cited
2020“This work is antithetical to the spirit of research”: An anatomy of harsh peer reviews65 cited

Cited by

2024Key Guidelines for Responding to Reviewers16 cited
2022Motivating and Maintaining Ethics, Equity, Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Expertise in Peer Review10 cited
2024A harm reduction approach to improving peer review by acknowledging its imperfections8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work