Representation of Women on National Institutes of Health Study Sections

Anna Volerman · Vineet M. Arora · John Cursio · Helen Wei · Valerie G. Press

24 citations0/0 files storedJAMA Network Open

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Diversity and Career in Medicine Gender Diversity and Inequality Sex and Gender in Healthcare

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examines the proportion of women represented on National Institutes of Health study sections and whether there is an association with research funding levels.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.

References

2019Comparison of National Institutes of Health Grant Amounts to First-Time Male and Female Principal Investigators 2011Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs 2015Sex Differences in Institutional Support for Junior Biomedical Researchers 2016Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?2017Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques 2011Similarities and Differences in the Career Trajectories of Male and Female Career Development Award Recipients

Cited by

2021The Women’s Leadership Gap in Diabetes: A Call for Equity and Excellence

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.