Online Social Connection as a Buffer of Health Anxiety and Isolation During COVID-19

Jaimee Stuart · Karlee J. O’Donnell · Alexander William O'Donnell · Riley A. Scott · Bonnie L. Barber

105 citations0/0 files storedCyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

COVID-19 and Mental Health Impact of Technology on Adolescents Communication and COVID-19 Impact

Abstract

Abstract COVID-19 has given rise to a myriad of social, psychological, and health-related complications. The specific mental health implications of COVID-19 are still being uncovered, but we know that there are likely to be negative outcomes for many people. This is particularly the case for vulnerable members of the community, such as those with high health anxiety, and under conditions where individuals feel isolated or disconnected from others. The objective of this study was to examine whether the level of socially motivated Internet use acts as a buffer of the relationship between health anxiety, isolation behaviors, and depression. Participants ( N = 473; 67.3 percent female; M age = 23.03, SD = 7.50) from Australia completed self-report measures during the height of the national pandemic restrictions (April–May 2020). A regression analysis revealed positive relationships between health anxiety and isolation behaviors on depression and highlighted a three-way interaction effect. Specifically, health anxiety was significantly negatively associated with depression when participants engaged in fewer isolation behaviors. However, at higher levels of isolation behaviors, the relationship between health anxiety and depression was attenuated for participants with greater levels of online social connection. The findings suggest that online social connection buffered the negative effects of health anxiety under conditions of isolation. These results offer promising avenues to mitigate against vulnerabilities during the pandemic and highlight the need to promote alternate social support mechanisms in the absence of face-to-face connection.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 105 citations exist upstream.

References

1985Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.2020The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence 1995The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories 2020The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health 2020The Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 and Physical Distancing 2020The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis 2020Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic 2020Prevalence and predictors of PTSS during COVID-19 outbreak in China hardest-hit areas: Gender differences matter

Cited by

2021COVID-19: Factors associated with psychological distress, fear, and coping strategies among community members across 17 countries 2021Reopening after lockdown: the influence of working-from-home and digital device use on sleep, physical activity, and wellbeing following COVID-19 lockdown and reopening 2022Experience Pandemic Fatigue? Social Media Use May Play a Role: Testing a Model of Pandemic Fatigue Development from a Social Media Perspective

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.