SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Is preprint the future of science? A thirty year journey of online preprint services
15 references·10 citing·49 second hop
Is preprint the future of science? A thirty year journey of online preprint services (2021)Is preprint the future of science? A thir…Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting (2020)Systematic examination of pre…How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research (2020)How swamped preprint servers …Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Characteristics of academic p…Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article (2019)Releasing a preprint is assoc…On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)On the value of preprints: An…Science of science (2018)Science of scienceAltmetric Scores, Citations, and Publication of Studies Posted as Preprints (2018)Altmetric Scores, Citations, …Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission (2017)Ten simple rules to consider …Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors (2016)Reproducibility: A tragedy of…Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system (2014)Peer review for biomedical pu…Runaway events dominate the heavy tail of citation distributions (2012)Runaway events dominate the h…Universality of citation distributions revisited (2011)Universality of citation dist…Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics (2009)Citing and reading behaviours…Reviewing Peer Review (2008)Reviewing Peer ReviewPeer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…Preprint servers and journals: rivals or allies? (2025)Preprint servers and journals…The scientific periphery and new flows of knowledge: the case of regional preprint servers (2024)The scientific periphery and …Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news (2024)Public understanding of prepr…How the readability of manuscript before journal submission advantages peer review process: Evidence from biomedical scientific publications (2024)How the readability of manusc…Are Preprints a Threat to the Credibility and Quality of Artificial Intelligence Literature in the ChatGPT Era? A Scoping Review and Qualitative Study (2024)Are Preprints a Threat to the…Understanding the Use of e-Prints on Reddit and 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Board (2023)Understanding the Use of e-Pr…To Preprint or Not to Preprint: A Global Researcher Survey (2023)To Preprint or Not to Preprin…Open Science in Italy: Lessons Learned En Route to Opening Scholarship (2023)Open Science in Italy: Lesson…The normalization of preprints (2022)The normalization of preprintsLegacy of Jon Tennant, “Open science is just good science” (2022)Legacy of Jon Tennant, “Open …Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Bias in peer review (2012)Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? (2019)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? (2004)Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles (2006)Making Open Science a Reality (2015)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Accelerating scientific publication in biology (2015)Does it take too long to publish research? (2016)Preprints for the life sciences (2016)Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science (2018)Making Open Science Work for Science and Society (2019)Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2015)Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines (2020)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology (2019)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method (2014)quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data (2018)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)Rise of the Rxivs: How Preprint Servers are Changing the Publishing Process (2020)Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)Positive and negative impact of social media in the COVID-19 era (2020)The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality (2020)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Lockdown-Related Disparities Experienced by People with Disabilities during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review with Thematic Analysis (2021)The Perception and Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccines: A Cross-Sectional Study in Poland (2021)The Strategies to Support the COVID-19 Vaccination with Evidence-Based Communication and Tackling Misinformation (2021)Scientific peer review (2011)Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective (2017)Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows (2017)COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time (2019)AiiDA 1.0, a scalable computational infrastructure for automated reproducible workflows and data provenance (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018Science of science1,659 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals814 cited
  • 2016Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors261 cited
  • 2019Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article186 cited
  • 2019On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective184 cited
  • 2020How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research174 cited
  • 2017Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission162 cited
  • 2020Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic130 cited
  • 2008Reviewing Peer Review119 cited
  • 2009Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics117 cited
  • 2020Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting112 cited
  • 2018Altmetric Scores, Citations, and Publication of Studies Posted as Preprints109 cited
  • 2014Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system103 cited
  • 2011Universality of citation distributions revisited86 cited
  • 2012Runaway events dominate the heavy tail of citation distributions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

42 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news9 cited
  • 2023To Preprint or Not to Preprint: A Global Researcher Survey7 cited
  • 2024How the readability of manuscript before journal submission advantages peer review process: Evidence from biomedical scientific publications6 cited
  • 2022The normalization of preprints6 cited
  • 2025Preprint servers and journals: rivals or allies?5 cited
  • 2023Open Science in Italy: Lessons Learned En Route to Opening Scholarship5 cited
  • 2022Legacy of Jon Tennant, “Open science is just good science”5 cited
  • 2024The scientific periphery and new flows of knowledge: the case of regional preprint servers4 cited
  • 2024Are Preprints a Threat to the Credibility and Quality of Artificial Intelligence Literature in the ChatGPT Era? A Scoping Review and Qualitative Study4 cited
  • 2023Understanding the Use of e-Prints on Reddit and 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Board4 cited