SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Challenges to Evidence Synthesis and Identification of Data Gaps in Human Biomonitoring
16 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Challenges to Evidence Synthesis and Identification of Data Gaps in Human Biomonitoring (2021)Challenges to Evidence Synthesis and Iden…Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Searching for and selecting s…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)Gray literature: An important…What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products (2016)What is an evidence map? A sy…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies (2016)Shades of Grey: Guidelines fo…Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)Searching for grey literature…CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updat…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Meta-Analysis in Medical Research (2009)Meta-Analysis in Medical Rese…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Meta‐Analysis in Medical Research (2005)Meta‐Analysis in Medical Rese…Writing Narrative Literature Reviews (1997)Writing Narrative Literature …Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Sex Differences in Social Behavior (2013)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies (2020)A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm (2020)Systematic-narrative hybrid literature review: A strategy for integrating a concise methodology into a manuscript (2022)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement84,364 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement65,829 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.48,853 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,960 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,995 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials3,833 cited
  • 1997Writing Narrative Literature Reviews1,697 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2017Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews1,508 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,499 cited
  • 2016Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies1,024 cited
  • 2013Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits829 cited
  • 2005Meta‐Analysis in Medical Research691 cited
  • 2016What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

670 cited
  • 2009Meta-Analysis in Medical Research657 cited
  • 2019Searching for and selecting studies651 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.