Responding to family violence: Variations in knowledge, confidence and skills across clinical professions in a large tertiary public hospital

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare workers play a vital role in assessing and appropriately responding to family violence. Discipline-specific differences in the readiness to respond have been indicated in the literature but no studies have directly compared multiple disciplines using the same measure. Given the imperative need for a hospital-wide, multidisciplinary approach to managing family violence, this study aimed to compare and contrast clinician perceived levels of knowledge, confidence and clinical readiness to manage disclosures of family violence across major professional groups in a tier 1, tertiary adult trauma hospital in Australia. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study implemented a brief questionnaire to explore self-reported knowledge, confidence and clinical skills in managing family violence. Data were analysed using non-parametric analyses. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for observational research were followed in the reporting of this study. RESULTS: Significantly greater self-reported clinical skills, knowledge and confidence were found among social work clinicians relative to all other disciplines. By contrast, allied health clinicians reported the lowest levels of clinical knowledge, confidence and skills relative to other discipline areas. No significant differences were seen between nursing and medicine. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences across clinical professional groupings in knowledge and confidence levels, and clinical skills in assisting patients experiencing family violence. The findings have implications for facilitating a hospital-wide, multidisciplinary response to assisting clients experiencing family violence.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.