SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ensuring Sustainable Evaluation: How to Improve Quality of Evaluating Grant Proposals?
16 references·0 citing·51 second hop
Ensuring Sustainable Evaluation: How to Improve Quality of Evaluating Grant Proposals? (2021)Ensuring Sustainable Evaluation: How to I…The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)The limitations to our unders…What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences? (2018)What do we know about grant p…Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada (2018)Assessment of potential bias …Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? (2017)Performance appraisal and per…Scientific literature: Information overload (2016)Scientific literature: Inform…Sustainability in project management: A literature review and impact analysis (2014)Sustainability in project man…Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel (2011)Funding grant proposals for s…A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)A Reliability-Generalization …A literature review of the anchoring effect (2010)A literature review of the an…Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)Improving the peer-review pro…Game Management, Context Effects, and Calibration: The Case of Yellow Cards in Soccer (2008)Game Management, Context Effe…Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications (2007)Peer review for improving the…Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)Effects of training on qualit…First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. (2001)First offers as anchors: The …Rater bias in psychological research: When is it a problem and what can we do about it? (2000)Rater bias in psychological r…STABILITY OF RATER LENIENCY: THREE STUDIES. (1995)STABILITY OF RATER LENIENCY: …Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)A power primer. (1992)Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (1998)Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology (2001)Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion (2006)Classroom Climate and Contextual Effects: Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Evaluation of Group-Level Effects (2012)A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE (1955)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis (2015)A practical guide to structured expert elicitation using the IDEA protocol (2017)Expasy, the Swiss Bioinformatics Resource Portal, as designed by its users (2021)Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. (1983)Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. (2001)8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status (2008)Why It Pays to Get Inside the Head of Your Opponent (2008)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. (2009)Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance and Resource Allocation in Science (2014)Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)A constant error in psychological ratings. (1920)THE IMPACT OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON TURNOVER, PRODUCTIVITY, AND CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. (1995)Critical Incident Technique (2007)Assessing Job Performance Using Brief Self-report Scales: The Case of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (2019)Work-family strategies during COVID-19: Examining gender dynamics among dual-earner couples with young children. (2020)Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT (2023)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots (2023)The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research (2023)Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review (2016)Sustainable project management through project control in infrastructure projects (2017)Critical success factors of sustainable project management in construction: A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP approach (2018)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)scite: A smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning (2021)The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010A literature review of the anchoring effect1,178 cited
  • 2001First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus.836 cited
  • 2017Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?676 cited
  • 2014Sustainability in project management: A literature review and impact analysis451 cited
  • 2020The limitations to our understanding of peer review383 cited
  • 2016Scientific literature: Information overload326 cited
  • 2000Rater bias in psychological research: When is it a problem and what can we do about it?323 cited
  • 2008Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.299 cited
  • 2004Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial268 cited
  • 2010A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants232 cited
  • 2018Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada151 cited
  • 2011Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel134 cited
  • 2008Game Management, Context Effects, and Calibration: The Case of Yellow Cards in Soccer122 cited
  • 1995STABILITY OF RATER LENIENCY: THREE STUDIES.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

115 cited
  • 2018What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?102 cited
  • 2007Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications99 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.