SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review (2021)Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Libr…Doing Grounded Theory (2018)Doing Grounded TheoryUntangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research (2017)Untangling Academic Publishin…Troubling intra-actions: gender, neo-liberalism and research in the global academy (2015)Troubling intra-actions: gend…Peer review: still king in the digital age (2014)Peer review: still king in th…Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature (2013)Defining and Characterizing O…The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft (2012)The SAGE Handbook of Intervie…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewThe ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature (2010)The ethics of scholarly peer …Information Literacy and Reflective Pedagogical Praxis (2008)Information Literacy and Refl…Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process…Critical Information Literacy: Implications for Instructional Practice (2006)Critical Information Literacy…‘Why not give us the full story?’: functions of referees’ comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers (2003)‘Why not give us the full sto…Free Labor for Costly Journals? (2001)Free Labor for Costly Journal…Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2000)Information Literacy Competen…A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy (2000)A randomized controlled study…Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Patterns of evaluation in sci…Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1984)Reading images: the grammar of visual design (1996)Reframing Information Literacy as a Metaliteracy (2011)Undergraduates’ Use of Social Media as Information Sources (2014)Democracy and Education (2015)Posttruth, Truthiness, and Alternative Facts: Information Behavior and Critical Information Consumption for a New Age (2017)A pedagogy of Multiliteracies Designing Social Futures (1996)Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (2001)Information Literacy 2.0: hype or discourse refinement? (2010)Informed learning: A pedagogical construct attending simultaneously to information use and learning (2010)Libraries as the Spaces Between Us (2011)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)Women Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review to Outline the Boundaries of Scientific Literature (2020)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Theory and practice of online learning (2004)Does Media Literacy Help Identification of Fake News? Information Literacy Helps, but Other Literacies Don’t (2019)Journal Pricing and Mergers: A Portfolio Approach (2002)Evaluating big deal journal bundles (2014)IDENTIFYING THE EFFECT OF OPEN ACCESS ON CITATIONS USING A PANEL OF SCIENCE JOURNALS (2014)The changing forms and expectations of peer review (2018)The state of the art in peer review (2018)Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage (2024)Scientific peer review (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Focus Group Evidence (2013)Intimacy, rapport, and exceptional disclosure: a comparison of in-person and mediated interview contexts (2018)“Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education2,310 cited
  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
  • 2012The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft825 cited
  • 1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited
  • 2006Critical Information Literacy: Implications for Instructional Practice551 cited
  • 2001Free Labor for Costly Journals?286 cited
  • 2014Peer review: still king in the digital age243 cited
  • 2017Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research217 cited
  • 2008Information Literacy and Reflective Pedagogical Praxis165 cited
  • 2013Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature136 cited
  • 2015Troubling intra-actions: gender, neo-liberalism and research in the global academy136 cited
  • 2003‘Why not give us the full story?’: functions of referees’ comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers134 cited
  • 2000A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy92 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Doing Grounded Theory
92 cited
  • 2010The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature84 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.