SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Advancing knowledge about stakeholder engagement in multisectoral nutrition research
15 references·0 citing·55 second hopsampled
Advancing knowledge about stakeholder engagement in multisectoral nutrition research (2021)Advancing knowledge about stakeholder eng…The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics (2019)The dos and don’ts of influen…Rethinking Research Impact through Principles for Fair and Equitable Partnerships (2019)Rethinking Research Impact th…How Should Academics Engage in Policymaking to Achieve Impact? (2018)How Should Academics Engage i…Effective advocacy strategies for influencing government nutrition policy: a conceptual model (2018)Effective advocacy strategies…Building Development Studies for the New Millennium (2018)Building Development Studies …Playing the policy game: a review of the barriers to and enablers of nutrition policy change (2016)Playing the policy game: a re…Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review (2016)Characteristics of Qualitativ…Using political science to progress public health nutrition: a systematic review (2015)Using political science to pr…Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research (2014)Evaluating knowledge exchange…Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Content analysis and thematic…Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research (2011)Stakeholder engagement and kn…The qualitative content analysis process (2008)The qualitative content analy…Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality (2007)Generation of political prior…Analysing institutional partnerships in development: a contract between equals or a loaded process? (2006)Analysing institutional partn…What do buzzwords do for development policy? a critical look at ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘poverty reduction’ (2005)What do buzzwords do for deve…Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Qualitative Content Analysis (2014)One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? (2020)A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis (2021)Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (1971)Ways of Worldmaking (1978)Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World (1995)Buzzwords and fuzzwords: deconstructing development discourse (2007)Sport and Development (2011)From ‘gender equality and ‘women’s empowerment’ to global justice: reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development (2015)Science for the post-normal age (1993)SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation (2000)Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2003)Using Social Network Analysis to Monitor and Assess the Effectiveness of Knowledge Brokers at Connecting Scientists and Decision‐Makers: An Australian case study (2017)Evaluating the impacts of boundary-spanning activities at the interface of environmental science and policy: A review of progress and future research needs (2018)Science with society: Evidence-based guidance for best practices in environmental transdisciplinary work (2021)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis (2016)The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? (2016)The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. (1967)Strategic management a stakeholder approach (2010)Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes (2013)An applied methodology for stakeholder identification in transdisciplinary research (2016)Linking modes of research to their scientific and societal outcomes. Evidence from 81 sustainability-oriented research projects (2019)Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (1985)Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers (2003)Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research (2013)Communicating the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of government policies and their impact on public support: a systematic review with meta-analysis (2020)Towards unified global action on ultra-processed foods: understanding commercial determinants, countering corporate power, and mobilising a public health response (2025)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2008)An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research (2019)Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2019)Theme in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis (2019)Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting (2023)The Many Meanings of Research Utilization (1979)The Honest Broker (2007)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Smartphone technologies supporting community-based environmental monitoring and implementation: a systematic scoping review (2019)Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations (2019)The myth of ‘evidence-based policymaking’ in a decentred state (2020)Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. (1978)Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Changing Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior (2020)Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality (2020)The Evolving Field of Risk Communication (2020)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1991)Global public health: a scorecard (2008)Raising the priority of preventing chronic diseases: a political process (2010)The Lancet NCDI Poverty Commission: bridging a gap in universal health coverage for the poorest billion (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2008The qualitative content analysis process22,573 cited
  • 2013Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study8,321 cited
  • 2016Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review2,263 cited
  • 2005What do buzzwords do for development policy? a critical look at ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘poverty reduction’784 cited
  • 2007Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality710 cited
  • 2019The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics363 cited
  • 2014Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research335 cited
  • 2011Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research248 cited
  • 2016Playing the policy game: a review of the barriers to and enablers of nutrition policy change194 cited
  • 2018How Should Academics Engage in Policymaking to Achieve Impact?147 cited
  • 2018Effective advocacy strategies for influencing government nutrition policy: a conceptual model119 cited
  • 2015Using political science to progress public health nutrition: a systematic review44 cited
  • 2018Building Development Studies for the New Millennium36 cited
  • 2006Analysing institutional partnerships in development: a contract between equals or a loaded process?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

35 cited
  • 2019Rethinking Research Impact through Principles for Fair and Equitable Partnerships17 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.