SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools
16 references·1 citing·43 second hop
Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (2021)Methods to support evidence-informed deci…The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)The evolving role of preprint…The COVID-19 infodemic (2020)The COVID-19 infodemicPublishing volumes in major databases related to Covid-19 (2020)Publishing volumes in major d…Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge (2020)Pandemic publishing poses a n…MANAGING THE COVID-19 INFODEMIC: PROMOTING HEALTHY BEHAVIOURS AND MITIGATING THE HARM FROM MISINFORMATION AND DISINFORMATION (2020)MANAGING THE COVID-19 INFODEM…Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility (2020)Early in the epidemic: impact…Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews (2020)Defining Rapid Reviews: a sys…Coronavirus disease 2019: The harms of exaggerated information and non‐evidence‐based measures (2020)Coronavirus disease 2019: The…Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Method…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic (2015)Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid!…An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods (2015)An international survey and m…A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)A scoping review of rapid rev…The art and science of knowledge synthesis (2010)The art and science of knowle…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Production and use of rapid responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec (Canada): perspectives from evidence synthesis producers and decision makers (2024)Production and use of rapid r…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 (2020)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Psychiatric and medical comorbidities of eating disorders: findings from a rapid review of the literature (2022)Risk factors for eating disorders: findings from a rapid review (2023)Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness (2024)Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review (2020)A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being (2021)Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and Past Pandemics: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Knowledge, attitudes and practices of COVID-19 among income-poor households in the Philippines: A cross-sectional study (2020)Would you notice if fake news changed your behavior? An experiment on the unconscious effects of disinformation (2020)The Role of Trust in Mitigating Perceived Threat, Fear, and Travel Avoidance after a Pandemic Outbreak: A Multigroup Analysis (2021)Mining Dual Emotion for Fake News Detection (2021)Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science (2021)Sentiment Analysis for Fake News Detection (2021)Anti-science kills: From Soviet embrace of pseudoscience to accelerated attacks on US biomedicine (2021)Expectations and Interests of University Students in COVID-19 Times about Sustainable Development Goals: Evidence from Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru (2021)Role of neighborhood social support in stress coping and psychological wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Hubei, China (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2015A scoping review of rapid review methods1,145 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews1,141 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2021The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape556 cited
  • 2020The COVID-19 infodemic420 cited
  • 2020Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews384 cited
  • 2020Coronavirus disease 2019: The harms of exaggerated information and non‐evidence‐based measures364 cited
  • 2020MANAGING THE COVID-19 INFODEMIC: PROMOTING HEALTHY BEHAVIOURS AND MITIGATING THE HARM FROM MISINFORMATION AND DISINFORMATION301 cited
  • 2020Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge259 cited
  • 2020Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility196 cited
  • 2010The art and science of knowledge synthesis195 cited
  • 2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic
166 cited
  • 2020Publishing volumes in major databases related to Covid-19140 cited
  • 2015An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods130 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Production and use of rapid responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec (Canada): perspectives from evidence synthesis producers and decision makers15 cited