SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Replicability in Empirical Legal Research
16 references·0 citing·29 second hopsampled
Replicability in Empirical Legal Research (2021)Replicability in Empirical Legal ResearchThe Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for …Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (2019)Reproducibility and Replicabi…The preregistration revolution (2018)The preregistration revolutionMany Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)Many Labs 2: Investigating Va…Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Evaluating the replicability …A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics (2016)Evaluating replicability of l…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Investigating Variation in Replicability (2014)Investigating Variation in Re…Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined (2012)Is the Replicability Crisis O…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)The Strengthening the Reporti…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper (2017)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use (2019)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense (2019)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies (2017)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement65,829 cited
  • 2008The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies18,417 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,571 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,587 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,692 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,923 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,380 cited
  • 2018The preregistration revolution2,252 cited
  • 2018Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 20151,535 cited
  • 2016Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics1,358 cited
  • 2014Investigating Variation in Replicability1,282 cited
  • 2019Reproducibility and Replicability in Science1,089 cited
  • 2018Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings944 cited
  • 2012Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

695 cited
  • 2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity571 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.