SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How fragile are Mediterranean diet interventions? A research-on-research study of randomised controlled trials
8 references·1 citing·36 second hop
How fragile are Mediterranean diet interventions? A research-on-research study of randomised controlled trials (2021)How fragile are Mediterranean diet interv…Systematic Evaluation of the Robustness of the Evidence Supporting Current Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization Using the Fragility Index (2019)Systematic Evaluation of the …Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)Scientists rise up against st…Reporting of Multi-Arm Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2019)Reporting of Multi-Arm Parall…The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials as Quantified by the Fragility Index: A Systematic Review (2018)The Fragility of Statisticall…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature (2007)Persistence of Contradicted C…Paediatric surgical trials, their fragility index, and why to avoid using it to evaluate results (2022)Paediatric surgical trials, t…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Everyone's a Little Bit Biased (Even Physicians) (2008)A generalized view of self-citation: Direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation (2014)Learning From Testimony on Quantitative Research in Management (2019)INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey (2016)The Fragility Index of Hip Arthroscopy Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Survey (2021)The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Cartilage Restoration of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2021)The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Patellofemoral Instability Research: A Systematic Review (2021)The Statistical Crisis in Science (2014)How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches (2019)Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals (2020)Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence (2021)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomized trials (2025)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Uses and abuses of meta-analysis (2001)Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough (2012)The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research (2017)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2019Scientists rise up against statistical significance2,997 cited
  • 2019Reporting of Multi-Arm Parallel-Group Randomized Trials321 cited
  • 2007Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature227 cited
  • 2018The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials as Quantified by the Fragility Index: A Systematic Review72 cited
  • 2019Systematic Evaluation of the Robustness of the Evidence Supporting Current Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization Using the Fragility Index28 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Paediatric surgical trials, their fragility index, and why to avoid using it to evaluate results9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work