SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Using Normalized Entropy to Measure Uncertainty of Rankings for Network Meta-analyses
16 references·1 citing·32 second hop
Using Normalized Entropy to Measure Uncertainty of Rankings for Network Meta-analyses (2021)Using Normalized Entropy to Measure Uncer…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Empirical evaluation of SUCRA-based treatment ranks in network meta-analysis: quantifying robustness using Cohen’s kappa (2019)Empirical evaluation of SUCRA…Development of the summary of findings table for network meta-analysis (2019)Development of the summary of…Network Meta‐Analysis for Decision Making (2018)Network Meta‐Analysis for Dec…Network meta-analysis: the highest level of medical evidence? (2018)Network meta-analysis: the hi…Is providing uncertainty intervals in treatment ranking helpful in a network meta-analysis? (2018)Is providing uncertainty inte…Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses (2017)Approaches to interpreting an…Uncertainty in Treatment Rankings: Reanalysis of Network Meta-analyses of Randomized Trials (2016)Uncertainty in Treatment Rank…Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015 (2016)Bibliographic study showed im…The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)The PRISMA Extension Statemen…Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods (2015)Ranking treatments in frequen…Network Meta-analysis (2015)Network Meta-analysisUse of Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Network Meta-analysis (2014)Use of Generalized Linear Mix…Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review (2013)Analysis of the systematic re…Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Graphical methods and numeric…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and potential of mobile interventions for stress management (2025)A systematic review and Bayes…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples (2017)Comparative effects of pharmacological interventions for the acute and long-term management of insomnia disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2022)netmeta : An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods (2023)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Additional considerations are required when preparing a protocol for a systematic review with multiple interventions (2017)Introducing the Treatment Hierarchy Question in Network Meta-Analysis (2021)Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review (2003)Theory and practice of Bayesian and frequentist frameworks for network meta-analysis (2022)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a partially contextualised framework (2020)Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study (2022)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians (2016)Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how? (2022)BUGSnet: an R package to facilitate the conduct and reporting of Bayesian network Meta-analyses (2019)Undertaking network meta‐analyses (2019)Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis (2021)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations8,248 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 2010Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial3,764 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 2015Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods1,725 cited
  • 2015Network Meta-analysis778 cited
  • 2017Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses691 cited
  • 2018Network Meta‐Analysis for Decision Making340 cited
  • 2019Development of the summary of findings table for network meta-analysis218 cited
  • 2016Uncertainty in Treatment Rankings: Reanalysis of Network Meta-analyses of Randomized Trials201 cited
  • 2016Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015138 cited
  • 2013Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review106 cited
  • 2014Use of Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Network Meta-analysis92 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Network meta-analysis: the highest level of medical evidence?
91 cited
  • 2019Empirical evaluation of SUCRA-based treatment ranks in network meta-analysis: quantifying robustness using Cohen’s kappa89 cited
  • 2018Is providing uncertainty intervals in treatment ranking helpful in a network meta-analysis?84 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and potential of mobile interventions for stress management3 cited