SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science
0 references·16 citing·49 second hopsampled
The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)The fight against fake-paper factories th…Fabricated citations: an audit across 2·5 million biomedical papers (2026)Fabricated citations: an audi…The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)The entities enabling scienti…Journal of Global Health’s Guidelines for Reporting Analyses of Big Data Repositories Open to the Public (GRABDROP): preventing ‘paper mills’, duplicate publications, misuse of statistical inference, and inappropriate use of artificial intelligence (2025)Journal of Global Health’s Gu…Explosion of formulaic research articles, including inappropriate study designs and false discoveries, based on the NHANES US national health database (2025)Explosion of formulaic resear…The landscape of biomedical research (2024)The landscape of biomedical r…Predatory Publishing Lists: A Review on the Ongoing Battle Against Fraudulent Actions (2024)Predatory Publishing Lists: A…Paper mill challenges: past, present, and future (2024)Paper mill challenges: past, …Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills (2023)Risks of abuse of large langu…Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics (2023)Quantitative research assessm…Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill (2023)Publication and collaboration…How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought (2023)How to improve scientific pee…Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study (2022)Retracted papers originating …China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science? (2022)China’s Research Evaluation R…Where Are the Self-Correcting Mechanisms in Science? (2021)Where Are the Self-Correcting…The raw truth about paper mills (2021)The raw truth about paper mil…Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills (2021)Retractions, Fake Peer Review…THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology (2021)Responsible Research Assessment I: Implementing DORA and CoARA for hiring and promotion in psychology (2022)Shifting the Level of Selection in Science (2023)Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking the Scientific Publication Process (2015)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges (2022)Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills (2022)China's Publication Bazaar (2013)China bans cash rewards for publishing papers (2020)Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)Threats to scholarly research integrity arising from paper mills: a rapid scoping review (2022)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Publish or impoverish (2017)Using large language models to generate silicon samples in consumer and marketing research: Challenges, opportunities, and guidelines (2024)An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing (2012)‘Stamp out paper mills’ — science sleuths on how to fight fake research (2025)I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE (1950)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing (2025)Maintaining research integrity in the age of GenAI: an analysis of ethical challenges and recommendations to researchers (2025)When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.192 (2025)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Retracted papers originating from paper mills: a cross-sectional analysis of references and citations (2024)Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production (2025)Meta-Research in Biomedical Investigation: Gaps and Opportunities Based on Meta-Research Publications and Global Indicators in Health, Science, and Human Development (2025)Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science (2012)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences (2025)Quantifying new threats to health and biomedical literature integrity from rapidly scaled publications and problematic research (2025)Quantifying new threats to health and biomedical literature integrity from rapidly scaled publications and problematic research (2026)HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress (2017)The Paradox of Ethical AI-Assisted Research (2025)Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments (2000)The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior (2003)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Estimating the predictability of questionable open-access journals (2025)Open science and transparency are our strongest tools in the fight against fraudulent publishing activities (2025)Reformation of science publishing: the Stockholm Declaration (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2022Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study156 cited
  • 2025The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly128 cited
  • 2023Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill101 cited
  • 2023Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills100 cited
  • 2021The raw truth about paper mills99 cited
  • 2025Explosion of formulaic research articles, including inappropriate study designs and false discoveries, based on the NHANES US national health database95 cited
  • 2024The landscape of biomedical research89 cited
  • 2021Where Are the Self-Correcting Mechanisms in Science?81 cited
  • 2024Paper mill challenges: past, present, and future80 cited
  • 2021Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills80 cited
  • 2024Predatory Publishing Lists: A Review on the Ongoing Battle Against Fraudulent Actions74 cited
  • 2023How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought71 cited
  • 2026Fabricated citations: an audit across 2·5 million biomedical papers71 cited
  • 2022China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

70 cited
  • 2025Journal of Global Health’s Guidelines for Reporting Analyses of Big Data Repositories Open to the Public (GRABDROP): preventing ‘paper mills’, duplicate publications, misuse of statistical inference, and inappropriate use of artificial intelligence67 cited
  • 2023Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics60 cited