Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A dual strategy account of individual differences in information processing in contingency judgments

12 references·2 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1979Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?1,691 cited
2001Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: Two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation.544 cited
1965The display of information and the judgment of contingency.311 cited
1993Human contingency judgments: Rule based or associative?267 cited
2015Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced158 cited
1993Assessment of an information integration account of contingency judgment with examination of subjective cell importance and method of information presentation.147 cited
1980The judgment of contingency and the nature of the response alternatives.139 cited
1996Illusion of Control: Detecting Response-Outcome Independence in Analytic but Not in Naturalistic Conditions120 cited
2013Interactive effects of the probability of the cue and the probability of the outcome on the overestimation of null contingency71 cited
2012Direct evidence for a dual process model of deductive inference.44 cited
2021Reasoning strategy vs cognitive capacity as predictors of individual differences in reasoning performance32 cited
2017Dual frames for causal induction: the normative and the heuristic6 cited

Cited by

2024Individual differences in the evolution of causal illusions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

3 cited

2024Are There Two Kinds of Reasoners?2 cited