Five Questions to Understand Epistemology and Its Influence on Integrative Marine Research

Katie Moon · Christopher Cvitanovic · Deborah Ann Blackman · Ivan R. Scales · Nicola K. Browne

60 citations0/0 files storedFrontiers in Marine Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration Coastal and Marine Management Social Science and Policy Research

Abstract

Developing solutions to the complex and uncertain problems facing marine and coastal social-ecological ecosystems requires new forms of knowledge production and integration. While progress has been made both in terms of successfully producing integrated marine research and connecting that knowledge to decision-makers, a number of significant challenges remain that prevent the routine development and implementation of successful integrated research practice. Based on our own experiences as social researchers working within interdisciplinary research teams, we contend that one of the main barriers to successful integrative marine research relates to understanding, and where possible reconciling, the different epistemologies that unpin how knowledge is created or discovered in different disciplines. We therefore aim to provide an accessible introduction to the concept of epistemology, with a focus on its importance and influence to integrated marine research practice. Specifically, we present and discuss five questions of research design that relate to epistemology in integrative research practices: (1) What is the object of study we seek to create knowledge about; (2) how do we create knowledge; (3) who accepts knowledge as ‘true’ and how?; (4) how do we determine the epistemology underpinning marine science; and (5) what are the implications of epistemology for applied integrative marine science? We demonstrate the application of each question through a hypothetical case study of marine restoration, focusing on coral transplanting. Finally, we offer readers a simple heuristic to guide them, irrespective of career stage or discipline, to understand and account for epistemology when participating in integrative marine research practices.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 60 citations exist upstream.

References

2018Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 1981Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries 1963CONJECTURES AND REFUTATIONS 2002Knowledge and its Limits 2016An Indigenous Feminist's Take On The Ontological Turn: ‘Ontology’ Is Just Another Word For Colonialism 2020Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research 1973Belief, Truth and Knowledge 2014A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists

Cited by

2022Transdisciplinary partnerships for sustainability: an evaluation guide 2022Epistemic stability and epistemic adaptability: interdisciplinary knowledge integration competencies for complex sustainability issues 2022Breaking down barriers: The identification of actions to promote gender equality in interdisciplinary marine research institutions 2022More than money - The costs of knowledge exchange at the interface of science and policy 2022Crossing disciplinary boundaries: motivations, challenges, and enablers for early career marine researchers moving from natural to social sciences

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.