SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Adoption of peer review of literature search strategies in knowledge synthesis from 2009 to 2018: An overview
16 references·1 citing·38 second hop
Adoption of peer review of literature search strategies in knowledge synthesis from 2009 to 2018: An overview (2021)Adoption of peer review of literature sea…PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Meeting the review family: ex…Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval (2019)Errors in search strategies u…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (2018)ROSES RepOrting standards for…A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries (2018)A review of recent publicatio…Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Evaluations of the uptake and…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews (2015)Librarian co-authors correlat…Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian (2014)Network meta-analyses could b…Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…An Evidence Based Checklist for the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS EBC) (2010)An Evidence Based Checklist f…An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies (2009)An evidence-based practice gu…Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2021)Improving peer review of syst…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Searching for Studies (2008)Are Health Behavior Change Interventions That Use Online Social Networks Effective? A Systematic Review (2014)Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials (2014)Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies (2018)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning (2021)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,162 cited
  • 2021PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews3,654 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 2018ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps944 cited
  • 2017Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review768 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2009An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies607 cited
  • 2019Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements570 cited
  • 2015Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews330 cited
  • 2010An Evidence Based Checklist for the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS EBC)

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

200 cited
  • 2019Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval199 cited
  • 2018A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries186 cited
  • 2014Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian169 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial12 cited