SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Can the Mauritius Convention Serve as a Model for the Reform of Investor-State Arbitration in Connection With the Introduction of a Permanent Investment Tribunal or an Appeal Mechanism? – Analysis and Roadmap
0 references·1 citing·4 second hop
Can the Mauritius Convention Serve as a Model for the Reform of Investor-State Arbitration in Connection With the Introduction of a Permanent Investment Tribunal or an Appeal Mechanism? – Analysis and Roadmap (2016)Can the Mauritius Convention Serve as a M…From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court (2019)From Bilateral Arbitral Tribu…Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations (2005)THE PRINCIPLE OF SYSTEMIC INTEGRATION AND ARTICLE 31(3)(C) OF THE VIENNA CONVENTION (2005)The ICSID Convention A Commentary (2009)Constraints and incentives in the investment regime: How bargaining power shapes BIT reform (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2019From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court27 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work